Mouse Tumor Biology Database (MTB)
MTB Home   Help
Search for Help
 
in these sections
Search Forms
Tumor
Strain
Genetics
Pathology Images
Reference
Advanced
Search MTB Using Human Genes
Gene Expression Data Sets

Additional Resources
new PDX Like Me
PDX Finder
PDX Model Search
Faceted Tumor Search
Dynamic Tumor Frequency Grid
Other Cancer Websites
Immunohistochemistry
Lymphoma Pathology

Mouse Genome Informatics
The Jackson Laboratory
Citing These Resources
Warranty Disclaimer
& Copyright Notice

Send Questions and
Comments to User Support.

Last Database Update
2020-07-12
MTB 3.0
 
HelpHelp and Documentation Reference Detail  
Reference
Title: Identification of conserved gene expression features between murine mammary carcinoma models and human breast tumors.
Authors: Herschkowitz JI; Simin K; Weigman VJ; Mikaelian I; Usary J; Hu Z; Rasmussen KE; Jones LP; Assefnia S; Chandrasekharan S; Backlund MG; Yin Y; Khramtsov AI; Bastein R; Quackenbush J; Glazer RI; Brown PH; Green JE; Kopelovich L; Furth PA; Palazzo JP; Olopade OI; Bernard PS; Churchill GA; Van Dyke T; Perou CM
Journal: Genome Biol
Volume: 8
Issue: 5
Year: 2007
Pages: R76
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Although numerous mouse models of breast carcinomas have been developed, we do not know the extent to which any faithfully represent clinically significant human phenotypes. To address this need, we characterized mammary tumor gene expression profiles from 13 different murine models using DNA microarrays and compared the resulting data to those from human breast tumors. RESULTS: Unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis showed that six models (TgWAP-Myc, TgMMTV-Neu, TgMMTV-PyMT, TgWAP-Int3, TgWAP-Tag, and TgC3(1)-Tag) yielded tumors with distinctive and homogeneous expression patterns within each strain. However, in each of four other models (TgWAP-T121, TgMMTV-Wnt1, Brca1Co/Co;TgMMTV-Cre;p53+/- and DMBA-induced), tumors with a variety of histologies and expression profiles developed. In many models, similarities to human breast tumors were recognized, including proliferation and human breast tumor subtype signatures. Significantly, tumors of several models displayed characteristics of human basal-like breast tumors, including two models with induced Brca1 deficiencies. Tumors of other murine models shared features and trended towards significance of gene enrichment with human luminal tumors; however, these murine tumors lacked expression of estrogen receptor (ER) and ER-regulated genes. TgMMTV-Neu tumors did not have a significant gene overlap with the human HER2+/ER- subtype and were more similar to human luminal tumors. CONCLUSION: Many of the defining characteristics of human subtypes were conserved among the mouse models. Although no single mouse model recapitulated all the expression features of a given human subtype, these shared expression features provide a common framework for an improved integration of murine mammary tumor models with human breast tumors.
Additional
Information
in MTB
Tumor Records (15)
Strains (15)
Other
Accession
IDs
J:160877  Mouse Genome Informatics
17493263  National Library of Medicine/PubMed